History of the Connecticut Judicial Seal Home Home BannerBanner


 

 

 

 

 

   

4.2-26 Anticipatory Breach (Repudiation)

New June 1, 2012

The plaintiff claims that the defendant committed an anticipatory breach of the contract.  An anticipatory breach of contract occurs when one party to a contract indicates that (he/she/it) will not perform (his/her/its) obligations under the contract before the time for performance has arrived.  This indication can occur either by a statement that the party will not perform or by an act that indicates an unwillingness to perform.

If you find that the defendant did anticipatorily breach the contract by <describe>, then the plaintiff may recover damages from the defendant without having to await the time for the defendant’s performance under the contract.

In order to recover damages based on an anticipatory breach of contract, the plaintiff must also prove that (he/she/it) would have been able to perform under the contract on the date set for performance.

Authority and Notes

Pullman, Comley, Bradley & Reeves v. Tuck-it-away, Bridgeport, Inc., 28 Conn. App. 460, 465, cert. denied, 223 Conn. 926 (1992).  The so-called nonbreaching party’s ability to recover for anticipatory breach is limited by his ability to perform under the contract.  “ln order to establish that the defendants anticipatorily breached the contract, the plaintiff must be able to show that it would have been able to perform its obligations on the date set for performance.”  Land Group, Inc. v. Palmieri, 123 Conn. App. 84, 93 (2010).  The Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 254 (1) states that “[a] party’s duty to pay damages for total breach by repudiation is discharged if it appears after the breach that there would have been a total failure by the injured party to perform his return promise.”  2 Restatement (Second), Contracts § 254, p. 290 (1981).

“Repudiation can occur either by a statement that the promisor will not perform or by a voluntary, affirmative act that indicates inability, or apparent inability, substantially to perform.”  Gilman v. Pedersen, 182 Conn. 582, 584 (1981).


 

Attorneys | Case Look-up | Courts | Directories | Educational Resources | E-Services | Español | FAQ's | Juror Information | Media | Opinions | Opportunities | Self-Help | Home

Common Legal Words | Contact Us | Site Map | Website Policies and Disclaimers

Copyright © 2013, State of Connecticut Judicial Branch